Systems Theory – Gaps and Potential Improvement

A downside to the concept of diversion is found within its nuances and definitions. Since diversion is defined within each jurisdiction on a case-by-case basis, it becomes notoriously difficult to understand and report the logistics of these local program settings because of the variety of differing programs. In addition, each community assigns a different meaning to diversion, generating barriers for information sharing between organizations within each system (Gittner & Dennis, 2023).

There is an inherent absence of a normative system theory of diversion at the intersection of criminal justice and healthcare systems. Such a theory would provide a framework for understanding diversion’s goals, measuring program effectiveness, and determining optimal program delivery between these systems. Without this theory, decision-making about diversion programs will continue to be challenging. Diversion is a significant criminal justice and public health issue, rooted in a complex history of policing, corrections, and mental health treatment. It notes a contradiction where diversion can be seen as a reward for deviance by one system and as justified therapy by the other. Each system’s understanding and implementation of diversion are unique, which is why there needs to be a normative structure to have as a baseline (Gittner & Dennis, 2023). Diversion programs are not the problem; the issue presides in the implementation and informality of the program structure.

To learn more, click here

Citations

Gittner, L. S., Dennis, J. A., & Forbis, R. E. (2023). Diversion: A systems theory perspective. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 39(4), 471–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/10439862231189415

By: Mason Mehr, Intern